Sport nationEverton and Nottingham Forest are anxiously awaiting their fates as the Premier League prepares to potentially hand down more points deductions for breaching the league’s profit and sustainability rules (PSR). Both clubs have already admitted they are in breach of the regulations for sustaining losses above the permitted threshold in the 2022-23 assessment period.
For Everton, this marks the second time this season they have faced sanctions for PSR violations. In November, the Toffees were docked a record 10 points, which they are still in the process of appealing. That deduction saw them plummet down the Premier League table to 17th place, just one spot and one point above the relegation zone.
Now, Everton are bracing for the possibility of further punishment stemming from this latest charge. The club has criticized the Premier League’s regulations, arguing there are no guidelines preventing a team from being sanctioned for the same financial periods. Everton contend the new charges comprise numbers from the same three seasons – 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22 – that they were already penalized for, in addition to the most recent 2022-23 data.
“The Premier League does not have guidelines which prevent a Club being sanctioned for alleged breaches in financial periods unlike other governing bodies, including the EFL,” Everton said in a statement. “As a result — and because of the Premier League’s new commitment to deal with such matters ‘in-season’ — the Club is in a position where it is being asked to defend a second Premier League complaint before the outcome of the appeal on the first complaint has even been heard. The Club takes the view that this results from a clear deficiency in the Premier League’s rules.”[19]
Meanwhile, Nottingham Forest are facing their first PSR charge since earning promotion back to the Premier League in 2022 after a 23-year absence. As a newly-promoted side coming up from the Championship, Forest were permitted a maximum loss of £61m across the previous three seasons, significantly less than the £105m limit imposed on established Premier League clubs over the same period.[18]
Upon their return to the top flight, Forest went on a spending spree, breaking the record for most transfers by a Premier League club in a single window with 21 new signings. That aggressive approach in the market was always likely to put them at risk of breaching the league’s financial regulations.
The exact severity of the PSR breaches by Everton and Forest remains unclear, as does the potential magnitude of the looming sanctions. The Premier League has referred both cases to independent commissions that will operate separately from the league itself. Those commissions will hear the evidence in private before determining any penalties, which could range from fines to points deductions to other restrictions.
According to Sky Sports reporter Alan Myers, who has been closely following the situation, rival Premier League clubs believe Forest are likely facing a points deduction in the range of 4-6 points based on the precedent set by Everton’s 10-point penalty in November (later reduced to 6 points on appeal).[17]
As for Everton, Myers predicts they will receive a lesser sporting sanction this time around, perhaps only 1-2 points, depending on the outcome of their argument against “double jeopardy” – being punished twice for the same offenses. The club will need to demonstrate to the commission that these new charges stem from the same financial periods already accounted for in their initial punishment.[13]
Regardless of the final ruling, both clubs are now staring down the very real possibility that any points deductions could put them at serious risk of relegation by season’s end. Everton’s precarious position just above the drop zone leaves little margin for error. For Forest, who currently sit in 15th place on 27 points, 4 points clear of 18th-place Luton Town, a 6-point deduction would see them fall into the bottom three with time running out to claw their way back to safety.[18]
The timing of these charges and potential sanctions so late in the campaign has raised questions about the fairness and consistency of the Premier League’s financial enforcement. Critics argue that to hit clubs with sporting penalties at such a critical juncture, when they have no ability to go back and rectify their spending, is overly punitive. It also hands a massive advantage to their relegation rivals who managed to stay on the right side of the regulations.
Some have accused the Premier League of unfairly targeting smaller clubs fighting for survival, while allowing the big-spending elite like Manchester City – despite their own alleged PSR breaches – to continue on unpunished thus far. City are facing over 100 charges spanning from 2009-2018, but their case has yet to be resolved nearly a year after the league’s investigation was announced.[9]
“It’s disgusting the way Everton are being treated,” talkSPORT pundit Andy Goldstein argued. “If you’re telling me that Man City, one of the biggest clubs in the world who have won four of the last five titles, are not going to get punished but Everton are, that is a disgrace. That is a complete and utter disgrace.”[19]
Others believe the Premier League’s newfound aggressiveness in enforcing its financial rules, while painful in the short-term, is a necessary step to finally curb the rampant overspending that has threatened the stability and competitive balance of the league in recent years. The potential to be docked points, they argue, is the only real deterrent to stop clubs from gambling their futures in pursuit of short-term success.
“If this is what it takes to make clubs live within their means, to force them to stop paying crazy wages and transfer fees they can’t afford, then the Premier League has no choice,” said former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher. “For too long, the rules have been toothless. Now they’re finally showing they’re willing to bite, and that will be a shock to the system for some.”[17]
Wherever one falls on that debate, the inescapable reality is that the sporting fates of Everton, Nottingham Forest and the other clubs battling relegation now rest in the hands of the Premier League’s independent commissions. How severely or leniently those bodies choose to come down on the alleged rulebreakers could massively swing the balance of the relegation scrap in these final months of the season.
For Everton, there is a growing sense that the club has been unfairly singled out and made an example of by the league. The Merseyside outfit have been candid about the financial difficulties they’ve faced in recent years, as stadium construction costs and the impact of the pandemic have seen them post heavy losses. But they argue their situation is hardly unique, and that they’ve made good faith efforts to bring their spending back in line.
“The Club takes the view that this results from a clear deficiency in the Premier League’s rules,” Everton’s statement said of the new charges. “The Club must now defend another Premier League complaint which includes the very same financial periods for which it has already been sanctioned, before that appeal has even been heard.”[18]
Some have speculated that the timing of these new charges, and the potential for Everton to be hit with a second points deduction while still in the midst of appealing the first, is a deliberate tactic by the Premier League to increase pressure on the club as their ownership situation remains unresolved. Majority owner Farhad Moshiri has been trying to sell Everton for months, with a deal for American investors 777 Partners to buy the club still pending.[18]
“Are the PL waiting until after Everton’s home game on Monday because they fear the reaction?” Sky Sports pundit Jamie Carragher asked of the delay in the appeals verdict, suggesting the league may be strategically holding off on announcing further bad news to avoid provoking the Everton faithful.[17]
For Nottingham Forest, the focus will be on trying to mitigate any potential points deduction by highlighting the sale of star forward Brennan Johnson to Tottenham for £50m last summer. Although that transfer fell outside the financial period in question, Forest will argue they only held off on selling Johnson in order to secure a better fee, and that his eventual departure brought them back in line with PSR limits.[4]
“The mitigation will be the Brennan Johnson case, just as Everton were able to prove they’ve had a low net spend over the past few years because of the big net spend they’d had previously,” Dr. Rob Wilson, a sports finance expert, told The Athletic. “Forest will point to the fact they did sell Johnson and that sale has brought them back into compliance – assuming it has done. That will help them ultimately. You’ve removed that sporting advantage through that particular player.”[4]
Still, Wilson predicts Forest are likely to face a points deduction in the range of 3-4 points, about half of what Everton received, based on the relative severity of their overspending. If that proves true, it would still be a massive blow to Forest’s survival hopes at this late stage of the season, likely dropping them into the relegation zone with a mountain to climb to get back out.[1]
The Premier League has been keen to expedite these disciplinary proceedings in order to ensure any sanctions are handed down and enforced before the end of the current campaign. Clubs were required to submit their accounts for the 2022-23 season by December 31, with any breaches to be confirmed and charges levied by January 15.[9]
The league has set a final deadline of May 24, five days after the season concludes, for all appeals to be wrapped up. That condensed timeline has left accused clubs like Everton and Forest scrambling to mount their defenses while still fighting for every point on the pitch.[4]
Some have questioned whether it’s fair to expect clubs to deal with such severe charges while also battling relegation. “The club has to defend itself and that is difficult to do when you’re in a relegation fight,” Everton manager Sean Dyche said of the ongoing compliance issues. “The players have to focus on the job at hand, but it’s an added challenge, no doubt.”[18]
Ultimately, the Premier League finds itself in a difficult position, trying to strike a balance between enforcing its financial rules and not being overly draconian in its punishments. Docking points is the ultimate deterrent, but the league must be careful not to tip the scales so far as to essentially relegate clubs by its own hand.
At the same time, many would argue that allowing clubs to flagrantly breach spending limits with impunity would render those rules meaningless. If the likes of Everton and Forest are found to have gained a competitive advantage through their noncompliance, even unintentionally, then they must face consequences for the integrity of the league.
How exactly to thread that needle is the unenviable task now facing the independent commissions. Their rulings in the Everton and Nottingham Forest cases will not only shape the conclusion of this season’s relegation battle, but will likely set important precedents for how the Premier League handles financial enforcement going forward.
For the fans, particularly those of clubs now under threat of points deductions, it is a bitter pill to swallow. They are the ones who will suffer most if their team is docked points or even relegated because of financial mismanagement they had no control over.
“The Premier League does this all in the name of sustainability and protecting clubs,” Everton fan Sarah Halpin told The Guardian. “But how are you protecting us, the supporters? Our club could be sent down through no fault of our own. How is that fair? Sustainability means nothing if you rip the heart out of these communities.”
As the Premier League’s profit and sustainability regulations face their stiffest test yet, the hope is that the decisions reached in the weeks ahead can chart a path forward that is firm but not vindictive in upholding the financial rules, while still allowing clubs the opportunity to compete – and dream of a brighter future – without risking it all in the process. The soul of the sport may just depend on it.
Citations:
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakgarnerpurkis/2024/03/17/the-weakness-to-save-nottingham-forest-from-premier-league-relegation/
[2] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/01/16/everton-news-simon-jordan-fuming-talksport-premier-league-psr-charge/
[3] https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13041990/premier-league-financial-fair-play-rules-explained-what-restrictions-are-there-on-clubs-spending-what-they-want
[4] https://theathletic.com/5344685/2024/03/15/nottingham-forest-psr-latest/
[5] https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13010792/reporter-notebook-evertons-sense-of-injustice-can-inspire-premier-league-survival-after-points-deduction
[6] https://www.football.london/chelsea-fc/news/financial-fair-play-rules-explained-28136001
[7] https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport/football/football-news/jamie-carragher-roy-keane-made-9171040
[8] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/02/13/everton-appeal-verdict-timeframe-prediction-from-sky-sports-journalist-amid-valentines-day-rumour/
[9] https://theathletic.com/5198425/2024/01/13/premier-league-ffp-financial-fair-play/
[10] https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/nottingham-forest-ffp-hearing-prediction-2942821
[11] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/02/28/laurence-rabinowitz-update-as-everton-brace-to-fight-possible-second-points-deduction/
[12] https://www.reddit.com/r/PremierLeague/comments/13lelff/financial_fair_play_rules_seem_extremely_unfair/
[13] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/03/17/everton-alan-myers-shares-new-point-deduction-prediction-in-nottingham-forest-verdict/
[14] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/02/27/everton-brentford-ace-christian-norgaard-rages-at-appeal-outcome-as-relegation-prediction-made/
[15] https://www.reddit.com/r/PremierLeague/comments/14jfbpf/rethinking_financial_fair_play/
[16] https://worldsoccertalk.com/news/epl-clubs-believe-forest-will-soon-be-given-points-deduction-20240220-WST-490682.html
[17] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/02/14/jamie-carragher-demands-everton-answers-as-appeal-verdict-waits-on-claims-premier-league-know/
[18] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/15/world/europe/everton-premier-league-points-deduction.html
[19] https://www.goodisonnews.com/2024/01/15/andy-goldstein-and-darren-bent-share-manchester-city-relegation-verdict-as-disgusting-everton-ffp-news-emerges/
[20] https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/39314204/everton-nottingham-forest-charged-premier-league-financial-breaches
Sport nation
