Is Kudus a SCAPEGOAT for Inconsistent Decision? – Why Nottingham Forest Fans are ANGRY at Kudus Punishment will Surprise West Ham Fans….

Nottingham Forest Fans Fume Over FA’s Decision on West Ham’s Mohammed Kudus

Nottingham Forest supporters are outraged after the Football Association (FA) charged West Ham’s Mohammed Kudus for violent conduct, while Chelsea’s Nicolas Jackson escaped punishment for a similar offense.

The controversy began when Morgan Gibbs-White received a second yellow card against Brighton, which was later deemed incorrect by an independent panel. Despite this, Gibbs-White’s manager, Nuno Espirito Santo, received a three-game suspension, and owner Evangelos Marinakis was handed a five-game stadium ban for their reactions to the decision.

Fast-forward to the Chelsea vs. Nottingham Forest match, where Nicolas Jackson slapped Nottingham Forest’s Morato without facing any retrospective action from the FA. However, Chelsea and Nottingham Forest were both charged for the incident.

Now, Mohammed Kudus has been charged by the FA for allegedly acting in a violent and improper manner after being sent off for slapping and pushing Tottenham players.

Nottingham Forest fans feel hard done by, citing the inconsistency in the FA’s decisions. While Gibbs-White, Santo, and Marinakis faced suspensions for non-physical reactions, Jackson avoided punishment for physical misconduct.

The FA’s decision has sparked outrage, with many questioning the governing body’s consistency and fairness.

The incident highlights the need for clarity and consistency in the FA’s decision-making process to avoid discrepancies and ensure fairness across the league.